Efektivitas Asesmen Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi pada Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2023.v3i3-5
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Gusti Ayu Putu Trisna Wulandari Wulandari
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Bali, Indonesia
Ida Bagus Putrayasa
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Bali, Indonesia
I Nengah Martha
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Bali, Indonesia

Abstract

Students have very diverse backgrounds, so diagnostic assessments are needed in the practice of learning Indonesian at SMA Negeri 1 Kuta Utara. Diagnostic assessments are divided into two, namely non-cognitive diagnostic assessments and cognitive diagnostic assessments. This study is qualitative descriptive research, namely a research method which has the nature of presenting the reality according to the data obtained with the aim of illustrating how effective diagnostic assessment is in differentiated learning. Diagnostic assessments carried out in differentiated learning in Indonesian Language Lessons at SMA Negeri 1 North Kuta are very effective. After carrying out a diagnostic assessment, teachers can create learning that suits the characteristics, interests and abilities of students, relating to processes, content, products and learning environments. The use of diagnostic assessments can increase students' interest in learning Indonesian, because apart from making it easier to understand the material, learning is also tailored to students' readiness, interests and abilities.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Wulandari, G. A. P. T. W., Putrayasa, I. B., & Martha, I. N. (2023). Efektivitas Asesmen Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi pada Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2023.v3i3-5
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Alsuhairi, A. A. “The Effect of Implementing Mind Maps for Online Learning and Assessment on Students during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross Sectional Study.” BMC Medical Education 22, no. 1 (2022): 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03211-2.
  2. De Neve, D., G. Devos, and M. Tutens. “The Importance of Job Resources and Self-Efficacy for Beginning Teachers’ Professional Learning in Differentiated Instruction.” Teaching and Teacher Education 47, no. 1 (2015): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003.
  3. Ermiyanto, B., I. B. S., and A. Ilyas. “Asesmen Diagnostik Gaya Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas VII Di SMPN 4 Padang Panjang.” MANAZHIM 5, no. 1 (2023): 166–77. https://doi.org/10.36088/manazhim.v5i1.2845.
  4. Faiz, A., A. Pratama, and A. Kurniawaty. “Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Dalam Program Guru Penggerak Pada Modul 2.1.” Jurnal BASICEDU 6, no. 2 (2022): 2846–53. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2504.
  5. Fitra, D. K., W. Herwina, R. P. Bendriyanti, C. Dewi, and I. Nurhasanah. “Optimalisasi Kebutuhan Murid Dan Hasil Belajar Dengan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi.” Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan 35, no. 2 (2021): 74–76. https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.352.10.
  6. Hikmasari, P., Kartono, and S. Mariani. “Analisis Hasil Asesmen Diagnostik Dan Pengajaran Remedial Pada Pencapaian Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Melalui Model Problem Based Learning.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1:400–408. 1. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2018. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19610.
  7. Laulita, Ulfa, Marzoan, and Fitriani Rahayu. “Analisis Kesiapan Guru Dalam Mengimplementasikan Asesmen Diagnostik Pada Kurikulum Merdeka” 5, no. 2 (2022): 1–17.
  8. Marlina. Panduan Pelaksanaan Model Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Di Sekolah Inklusif. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang, 2019.
  9. Maut, W. O. A. “Asesmen Diagnostik Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka (IKM) Di SD Negeri 1 Tongkuno Kecamatan Tongkuno Kabupaten Muna Sulawesi Tenggara.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat: DIKMA 2, no. 4 (2022): 1305–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/dikmas.2.4.1305-1312.2022.
  10. Mutiani, M., Abbas E. Warmansyah, and H. Susanto. “Membangun Komunitas Belajar Melalui Lesson Study Model Transcript Based Learning Analysis (TBLA) Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah.” Historia: Jurnal Pendidik Dan Peneliti Sejarah 3, no. 2 (2020): 113–22. https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v3i2.23440.
  11. Nasution, Suri Wahyuni. “Assesment Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Di Sekolah Dasar.” Mahesa Research Center 1, no. 1 (2022): 135–42. https://doi.org/10.34007/ppd.v1i1.181.
  12. Pratiwi, Brillianing’, and Kusnindyah Puspito Hapsari. “Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Dalam Pemanfaatan YouTube Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia” 4, no. 2 (2020).
  13. Rakhmi, M. P., A. P. Y. Utomo, S. A. A. S. Putri, and W. Ghufron. “Pemanfaatan Google Form Dalam Asesmen Diagnostik Di SMA Negeri 11 Semarang.” Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education 2, no. 1 (2023): 115–26. https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v2i1.236.
  14. Rizal, Dimas Ahmad, Moh. Zodikin Zani, dan Zulkifli Syauqi Thontowi. “Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka Perspektif Pendidikan Humanis Religius.” Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2023): 23–38.
  15. Setiawan, D., N. Nuri, and N. Faoziyah. “Pengembangan Asesmen Diagnostik Berformat Four-Tier Untuk Mengungkap Profil Pemahaman Konsep Mahapeserta Didik Teknik.” ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika 8, no. 1 (2022): 66. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v8i1.8413.
  16. Sotlikova, Rimajon, and Haerazi. “Students’ Perceptions Towards The Use Of Podcasts in EFL Classroom: A Case Study at A University of Uzbekistan.” JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching 11, no. 3 (2023): 461–74. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v%vi%i.8172.
  17. Supriatna, A. “Kegiatan Lesson Study Sebagai Upaya Guru Untuk Menemukan Pembelajaran Yang Memenuhi Keperluan Anak Hidup Pada Zamannya (Era Revolusi Industri 4.0.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Internasional, 1–5. Semarang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, 2018.
  18. Tang, F., and P. Zhan. “Does Diagnostic Feedback Promote Learning? Evidence From a Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment.” AERA Open 7, no. 1 (2021): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211060804.
  19. Tomlinson, C. A. The Differentiated ClassroomResponding to The Needs of All Learners. Alexandria: Ascd, 2014.
  20. Toprak, Tugba E., and Abdulvahit Cakir. “Examining the L2 Reading Comprehension Ability of Adult ELLs: Developing a Diagnostic Test within The Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework.” SAGE Journals 38, no. 1 (2020): 106–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220941470.
  21. Wahyuni, H. S. “Efektivitas Pemberian Asesmen Diagnostik Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Materi Ekologi Pada Peserta Didik Kelas 7C SMPN 1 Jabung Semester 2 Tahun Pelajaran 2022/2023.” Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Riset Pendidikan 3, no. 3 (2023): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.28926/jprp.v3i3.1051.