The Role of Flight Instructors as Catalysts of Safety Management System in Aviation Academies: A Systematic Literature Review

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 31, 2026
https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i3-18
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Yasyfa' Kawakibi
Akademi Penerbang Indonesia Banyuwangi, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8341-8424
Dimas Hari Cahyo
Akademi Penerbang Indonesia Banyuwangi, Indonesia
Hendra Sudarso
Akademi Penerbang Indonesia Banyuwangi, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8615-3898

Abstract

Purpose – The objective of this article is to undertake a comprehensive literature analysis of the strategic importance of flight instructors as implementers of the Safety Management System (SMS) in Approved Training Organisations (ATOs). This review synthesizes the research to understand how instructors transform formal safety principles into everyday operational activities and presents a new conceptual framework of meso-level safety leadership for aviation schools.
Methods – A qualitative topic synthesis was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 procedure. The authors collected metadata of the papers in the Google Scholar database from 2013 to 2025 with the Publish or Perish software. Twelve core peer-reviewed papers were selected for final analysis under tight inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality grading procedures to limit the subjectivity of single-researcher selection.
Findings – Instructors are essential bridges in the meso-layer, transferring explicit SMS rules into everyday actions. These instructors create psychologically safe environments during non-punitive debriefs, fostering an organic safety culture. However, the academic “pressure to fly” and high staff turnover severely limit this catalytic impact. We have developed the ‘Meso-Catalytic Safety Leadership Framework’ to show that generative safety is really the intersection of great meso-leadership and a psychologically secure climate.
Research Implications – The results have practical implications for ATO administrators to restructure Flight Instructor standardization programs with the integration of emotional intelligence and scenario-based safety leadership training. The limitation of the technique is that the current literature is cross-sectional. For future research methodology for an exploratory study, we would recommend longitudinal designs and the ability to apply artificial intelligence reporting systems to offset the loss of institutional memory.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kawakibi, Y., Cahyo, D. H., & Sudarso, H. (2026). The Role of Flight Instructors as Catalysts of Safety Management System in Aviation Academies: A Systematic Literature Review. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(3), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i3-18
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adjekum, D. K. (2014). Safety management systems in aviation operations in the United States: Is the return on investment worth the cost? Prime Journal of Business Administration and Management, 4 (4). https://commons.und.edu/avi-fac/17/
  2. Adjekum, D. K. (2016). An evaluation of the relationships between safety management system initiatives, transformational safety leadership, self-efficacy, safety behavior, and safety-related events mediated by safety motivation in collegiate aviation. The University of North Dakota. https://www.proquest.com/openview/acb4b3b64562175db6581785951dd179/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
  3. Adjekum, D. K. (2017). An evaluation of the relationships between collegiate aviation safety management system initiative, self-efficacy, transformational safety leadership and safety behavior mediated by safety motivation. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaa.2017.1169
  4. Adjekum, D. K., Keller, J., Walala, M., Young, J. P., Christensen, C., DeMik, R. J., & Northam, G. J (2015). Cross-sectional assessment of safety culture perceptions and safety behavior in collegiate aviation programs in the United States. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2015.1074
  5. Bieder, C. (2022). Safety management systems and their origins: insights from the aviation industry. CRC Press.
  6. Boeing. (2020). Commercial market outlook 2020–2039. Technical Report.
  7. Cahyo, D. H., Rumani, D. D., & Kurniawanto, H. (2025). The Role of Flight Instructors in Building Safety Culture among Student Pilots at API Banyuwangi. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis. 350–354. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v7i2.1172
  8. Dekker, S. W. A. (2014). The bureaucratization of safety. Safety Science, 70, 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.07.015
  9. Foster, A. R., & Adjekum, D. K. (2022). A qualitative review of the relationship between safety management systems (SMS) and safety culture in Multiple-Collegiate aviation programs. The Collegiate Aviation Review International. 40(1). 63. https://commons.und.edu/avi-fac/18
  10. Foster, R. A., & Adjekum, D. K. (2023). Evaluating the effects of Safety Management Systems (SMS) on safety culture factors in collegiate aviation operations: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace. 10 (2). 6. https://doi.org/10.58940/2374-6793.1788
  11. Freiwald, D., Lenz-Anderson, C., & Baker. E (2013). Assessing safety culture within a flight training organization. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education and Research. 22 (2). 41. https://commons.erau.edu/db-applied-aviation/2
  12. Gao, Y., & Rajendran, N. (2017). Safety climate of ab-initio flying training organizations: The case of an Australian tertiary (collegiate) aviation program. figshare.swinburne.edu.au. https://doi.org/10.25916/sut.26245730
  13. Hong, S. J., Lee, K. S., Seol, E. S., & Young, S. (2016). Safety perceptions of training pilots based on training institution and experience. Journal of Air Transport Management, 55, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.05.010
  14. II, R. A. Hellings. (2023). The Effect of a Safety Incentive Program on Perceptions of Safety Culture. (Doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University).
  15. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  16. Reason, J. (1998). Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice. Work & Stress, 12(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379808256868
  17. Robertson, M. F. (2017). Examining the relationship between safety management system implementation and safety culture in collegiate flight schools. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2017.
  18. Sharma, V. (2023). CFIs’ Safety Behaviors at Flight Training Schools: Understanding the Effects of Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy, Risk Perception, and Safety Climate. Theses and Dissertations. 1235. https://repository.fit.edu/etd/1235
  19. Silcox, F., Sutliff, D., & Ley, S. (2023). Safety Culture in a Collegiate Flight Training Program. The Collegiate Aviation Review International, 41 (2), 279–287. Retrieved from http://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/CARI/article/view/9665/8612
  20. Thomas, B., & Lee, C. (2016). SMS Implementation in a Part 141 Flight School. Safety Management Systems in Aviation (pp. 301–324). Routledge.
  21. Wahren, E. (2014). Safety Culture Assessment and Interventions at Lund University School of Aviation.
  22. Wicaksono, A. W., Sonhaji, I., Peranginangin, A.F., & Mubarok, A. (2025). Safety Perception in Flight Training: A Q-Methodology Study on ICPA of Banyuwangi. Airman: Jurnal Teknik dan Keselamatan Transportasi, 8(2), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.46509/ajtk.v8i2.768