Strategi dan Konsep Teoritis dalam Pembiayaan Pendidikan di Indonesia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Mega Yesi Okta Fihana
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6777-6062

Abstract

Purpose – This research seeks to fill this gap by exploring educational funding theory and applying it concretely in the Indonesian context. Thus, it is hoped that this research can provide new insights and significantly contribute to designing more effective and inclusive policies to improve the Indonesian education system.
Methods – This research uses a descriptive research type method to better understand education financing from various theoretical and practical perspectives.
Findings – The research results show that financing education is very important because education can have significant costs, especially at the higher education level. Indonesia has taken steps to improve education financing and increase the accessibility and quality of education, the application of innovation in education financing in Indonesia has the potential to increase educational resources and the quality of education and ensure that every individual has an equal opportunity to get a quality education, but it is necessary considering Indonesia's social, economic, and cultural context as well as efforts to ensure long-term sustainability.
Research Implications – The phenomenon of increasing education costs is a concern and requires a balance between adequate funding, efficient allocation, and transparent management so that the right to education can be enjoyed without financial obstacles by all citizens. studies may not consider local factors that can influence the effectiveness of financing models, such as geographic conditions and cultural diversity in various regions of Indonesia. Further research with a contextual approach can provide more comprehensive insight into education financing problems at the local level.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Fihana, M. Y. O. (2024). Strategi dan Konsep Teoritis dalam Pembiayaan Pendidikan di Indonesia. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2024.v4i1-12

References

  1. Armida. (2001). Model Pembiayaan Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Akademika, (26) 1 Januari 2001
  2. CNBC Indonesia, Arif Gunawan. (2019). Belanja Pendidikan Tertinggi Ke-2 ASEAN, SDM RI Kok Buruk?.https://www.cnbc indonesia.com/news/20190616011324-4-78604/belanja-pendidikan-tertinggi-ke-2-asean-sdm-ri-kok-buruk
  3. Dinda Fitri Monita. (2019). Pembiayaan dalam Pendidikan. Artikel Universitas Negeri Padang
  4. Faisal. (2020). Pembiayaan Pendidikan di Indonesia Dan Berbagai Negara. Zenodo.Org, 1–28.
  5. Fattah, Nanang. (2009). Ekonomi dan Pembiayaan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
  6. Heyneman, SP, Loxley, WAA. (1983). Pengaruh Kualitas Sekolah Dasar Terhadap Akademik. Pencapaian di dua puluh sembilan negara berpendapatan tinggi dan rendah. Saya. J.Sosiol. 88 (6 Mei 1983)), 1162–1194
  7. Kemenkeu. (2022). Pemerintah Alokasikan Anggaran Pendidikan Tahun 2023 Sebesar Rp608,3 Triliun. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/berita-utama/anggaran-pendidikan-tahun-2023-sebesar-rp608,3-t
  8. Lewin, KM, Caillods, F. (2000). Pembiayaan Sekolah Menengah di Negara Berkembang: Strategi untuk Pertumbuhan Berkelanjutan. IIEP, UNESCO, Paris
  9. Lewin, KM. (2018). Pembelajaran Penting dan Laporan Pembangunan Dunia. Blog dan Video UKFIET. https://www.ukfiet.org/2018/learning-matters-and-the-world development-report-2018/ dan https://www.ukfiet.org/2018/learning-matters reaksi-to-the-world- laporan-perkembangan-2018/
  10. Lewin, KM. (2018). Apakah Dana Hasil Pendidikan adalah Pengubah Permainan. Blog UKFIET. https://www.ukfiet.org/2018/education-outcomes-fund-eof-for-africa-and-the middle-east-is-it-a-game-changer/
  11. Lewin, KM. (2019). Puncak Bantuan dan Waktunya untuk Sesuatu yang Berbeda. Blog UKFIET.https://www.ukfiet.org/2019/peak-aid-and-time-for-something-different-sustainable financing-for-education/
  12. Lewin, KM. (2020). Melampaui bisnis seperti biasa: Bantuan dan pembiayaan pendidikan di Afrika Sub Sahara. Jurnal Internasional Perkembangan Pendidikan 78 (2020) 102247, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102247
  13. Lockheed, Verspoor, 1990. Peningkatan Pendidikan Dasar di Negara Berkembang. Bank Dunia Washington DC.
  14. Morphet Edgar C. (1983). The Economic & Financing of Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc. Engetwood Cliffs
  15. Rida Fironika, K. (2011). Pembiayaan pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 26(1), 43-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/pendas.2.1.43-64
  16. Rukminingsih, R. (2020). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Erhaka Utama
  17. Soedijarto. (2006). Memahami Makna Yang Tersurat dan Tersirat Dari Pasal Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar 64 31 Ayat (4) UUD 1945 Tentang Anggaran Pendidikan. Jakarta: ISPI
  18. Supriyadi. (2003). Satuan Biaya Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
  19. Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Jakarta: Alfabeta
  20. Sofyan, Y., & Barlian, U. C. (2021). Analisis Pembiayaan Pendidikan (Suatu Kajian Praktis Dalam Pengeloaan Anggaran Pendidikan di Sekolah Menengah Umum). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 5(1), 221-239.