Integrasi Idealisme dan Realisme dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Manajerial Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Literatur dengan Perspektif Aksiologi

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 31, 2026
https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i1-11
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ahmad Lazuardi Al-Fitrie
Universitas Pakuan, Bogor, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6835-9719
Dadang Jaenudin
Universitas Pakuan, Bogor, Indonesia

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to examine the integration of idealism and realism in managerial decision-making at the elementary school level through the perspective of educational axiology.
Methods – The study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of articles indexed in Scopus, SINTA, and DOAJ published between 2021 and 2025. Literature selection followed inclusion–exclusion criteria and the PRISMA procedure, resulting in 25 eligible articles, which were analyzed using thematic synthesis.
Findings – The results indicate that idealism functions as a moral–philosophical foundation in shaping educational decisions, whereas realism provides empirical grounding that ensures decisions are contextually feasible and implementable. Axiology emerges as the integrative bridge connecting ethical values to practical execution, producing a conceptual managerial model based on value balance. The review also identifies several determining factors for successful integration, including leadership orientation, school culture, resource capacity, and institutional value documentation.
Research Implications – Theoretically, this study contributes a synthesized model of axiological integration between idealism and realism, offering a conceptual foundation for future value-based educational management research. Practically, it provides direction for school leaders and policymakers to develop decisions that are ethically anchored yet operationally adaptive. The study is limited to a literature-based review without empirical field validation; therefore, future research is recommended to test the model through case studies, field surveys, or measurement instrument development.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Al-Fitrie, A. L., & Jaenudin, D. (2026). Integrasi Idealisme dan Realisme dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Manajerial Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Literatur dengan Perspektif Aksiologi. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i1-11
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ari, A. W. D., & Siti Fadjarajani. (2025). Pengaruh Idealisme Dan Realisme Terhadap Pendidikan. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 2(1), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v2i1.358
  2. Atiqoh, A., Fauzi, A., & Gunawan, A. (2024). Analysis of Education Management Decision-Making Procedures as a Determining Factor for the Success of Educational Institutions. 2(6), 959–968. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i6.9930
  3. Beliani, K. (2024). Refleksi Filsafat Idealisme. 4(January), 145–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v4i2.752
  4. Chapman, E. (2022). Realism and Responsible Parties. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001204
  5. Hadi, M. Z. P., Hartono, R., & Rozi, F. (2024). Problem Solving and Decision Making in Educational Context. JISHUM: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57248/jishum.v2i4.408
  6. Helmi, S., Rifa, A., Darmuki, A., & Kanzunnudin, M. (2025). Supervisi Akademik Berbasis Bukti?: Tinjauan Filosofis Realisme Dalam Praktik Pengajaran. 5, 411–424. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurdikbud.v5i2.7160
  7. Idawati, Ahmad, A. K., Apriliah, N., & Sentya, M. (2024). Implementasi Filsafat Idealisme Melalui Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 09. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i04.20173
  8. Khonsa, N., Basuki, R. R., Rusmiyati, L., Rosyidi, U., & Takdir, M. (2025). Membangun Pendidikan yang Berkualitas?: Antara Idealitas dan Realitas. 07(02), 8983–8997. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i2.7809
  9. Liana, E., & Noermijati, N. (2024). Determination of Management Science?: Ontology , Epistemology and Axiology Perspectives. 3(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/ijam.v3i3.666
  10. Lima, W., & Newell-McLymont, P. (2021). Qualitative Research Methods: A Critical Analysis. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 11, 189–199. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.11.2.27
  11. Lyon, C. (2024). Between Realism and Idealism in the Politics of Development. Progress in Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934241299488
  12. Maulana, A. F., Ramadhan, G., Hidayat, W., & Supardi, S. (2023). Tinjauan Aksiologi dalam Filsafat Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Axiological Review in the Philosophy of Islamic Educational Management. 29(November), 82–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33503/paradigma.v29i4.551
  13. Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education?? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. PROSPECTS, 52(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09625-6
  14. Obgenika, G. E., & Orisheminone, A. (2022). Between Realism And Idealism in Philosophy?: A Critique. Journal of Applied Philosopy, 20(8.5.2017). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30346.95682
  15. Putra, I. N. Y. A., Hariana, K., Firmansyah, A., & Muchdar. (2024). Analysis of the Ideals and Reality of the Leadership Style of the Ministry of School in the Application of the Pancasila Student Profile Strengthening Project. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 7(2), 2900–2915. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v7i2.9201
  16. Rahman, H. (2023). Revisiting the Aged-based Educational Ideas of Plato. International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32996/ijahs.2023.3.3.1
  17. Rusliana, I., & Pribadi, P. (2025). Enhancing Educational Quality?: The Impact of Personality , Leader Values , Regulatory Focus , and Servant Leadership on Academic Performance. 6(3). https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v6i3.13808
  18. Saavedra, R. A., & Católica, U. (2023). Axiological Study of Educational Projects in Schools. 22(6), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.26
  19. Sahilan, S., Megawati, D., & Rahayu, M. (2025). Pengaruh filsafat idealisme dan realisme dalam praktik manajemen pendidikan. 10(3), 905–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34125/jkps.v10i3.746
  20. Saputri, H. (2024). Education in the View of Realism Philosophy. 4(January), 177–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v4i2.756
  21. Sunarti, S., & Rahman, B. (2025). Islamic Education Management in Axiological Studies?: The Integration of Scientific and Moral. 6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53800/a0bvsw05
  22. Syah, S., Kurniady, D. A., Yuniarsih, T., Prihatin, E., Supiani, S., & Nurfitriah, N. (2024). Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif School Management Model Based on Community Participation. 14(02), 1209–1223. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i1.202487
  23. Veleti?, J., Price, H. E., & Vegar, R. (2023). the role of principals ’ leadership style in organizational quality. In Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Vol. 35, Issue 4). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-023-09413-6