Model Kepemimpinan Partisipatif Vroom-Yetton dalam Meningkatkan Keterlibatan dan Pengambilan Keputusan di Lembaga Pendidikan: Sebuah Kajian Literatur

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 30, 2025
https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2025.v5i2-11
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Basri Asyibli
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5543-998X
Sarmain Sarmain
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Indonesia
Encep Syarifudin
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Indonesia
Rifyal Ahmad Lugowi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Indonesia

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to explore the application of the Vroom-Yetton Participatory Leadership Model in improving the involvement and effectiveness of decision-making in educational institutions. Because education has a crucial role in producing human resources who can overcome various social problems, and effective leadership in educational institutions is essential to create a productive and innovative learning environment.
Method – The method used was a literature review, by collecting and analyzing the literature from various relevant sources, regarding the Vroom-Yetton Model, participatory leadership, and decision-making in an educational context. Includes journal articles and books published between 2015 and 2025, consisting of 18 articles and 3 relevant books.
Findings – The study analyzed 21 academic literature that discussed the application of the Vroom-Yetton model in the education sector, with key findings that the application of this model can improve decision quality, decision acceptance rates, and satisfaction with decision-making processes among stakeholders. The Vroom-Yetton model also encourages the development of students' social and leadership skills, as well as creating a more collaborative and responsive learning environment.
Research Implications – The implications of this study emphasize the importance of adopting a participatory approach in educational leadership to achieve high-quality learning goals. In addition, this study identifies the need for training for school principals in implementing this model effectively. Further research is needed to explore the application of the model in a broader context in various educational institutions, as well as to identify the factors that influence the successful implementation of this leadership model.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Asyibli, B., Sarmain, S., Syarifudin, E., & Lugowi, R. A. (2025). Model Kepemimpinan Partisipatif Vroom-Yetton dalam Meningkatkan Keterlibatan dan Pengambilan Keputusan di Lembaga Pendidikan: Sebuah Kajian Literatur. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2025.v5i2-11
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394
  2. Agazu, B. G., Birbirsa, Z. A., & Werke, S. Z. (2022, October 12). Leadership Models and Change Management: A Systematic Review, Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2075522/v1
  3. Andriyan, A., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2022). Optimalisasi penerapan dan pengelolaan manajemen berbasis sekolah: literatur review. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v10i1.45011
  4. Auer-Rizzi, W., & Reber, G. (2013). Leadership Styles: Inertia and changes in the Czech Republic. Journal of East European Management Studies, 18(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23608387
  5. Botutihe, S. N., Djafri, N., Halim, F., Haekal, T. M., Faliyandra, F., Utami, P. P., Butarbutar, M., Sudirman, A., Rahmat, A., Harini, H., Fatnasari, R., Kadir, S., Liriwati, F. Y., Yohana, C., Alam, H. V., & Lamadang, K. P. (2020). Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Prefisional Era Revolusi 4.0 (Cetakan 1). Zahir Publishing.
  6. Deshwal, V., & Ashraf Ali, M. (2020). A Systematic Review of Various Leadership Theories. Shanlax International Journal of Commerce, 8(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.34293/commerce.v8i1.916
  7. Dinibutun, S. R. (2020). Leadership: A Comprehensive Review of Literature, Research and Theoretical Framework. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.03.01.177
  8. Elmansy, R. (2015, Aug 20). Vroom-Yetton-Jago: Deciding How to Decide. Retrieved from Designorate: http://www.designorate.com/vroom-yetton-jagohow-to-decide/
  9. Fahmin, N., Jamrizal, & Us, K. A. (2024). Kepemimpinan Organisasi Pendidikan Unggul (Jenis, Gaya, dan Model). Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa, 2(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54066/jikma-itb.v2i1.1316
  10. Faujiah, H., Gunawan, A., & Syarifudin, E. (2023). Hubungan antara Gaya Kepemimpinan Partisipatif Vroom-Yetton dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa di Lembaga Pendidikan Indonesia. ManBiz: Journal of Management and Business, 3(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.47467/manbiz.v3i1.4380
  11. Fawzan, A., Sanjaya, B., Iranto, D., Adiwinata, D., Irnawati, J., Nafiudin, Syarini, R., Nugraheni, S., Febriantina, S., Paudi, U. La, Utaminingtyas, T. H., Suprayogi, W., & Roslita, E. (2023). Organizational behavior (theory and research mapping). Samudra Biru.
  12. Field, R. G. (1982). A test of the Vroom-Yetton normative model of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.523
  13. Ibrahim, A. E., Alfiah, L., & Roesminingsih, E. (2022). Implementasi Gaya Kepemimpinan Partisipatif pada Pendidikan Dasar di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Idarah?: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 12(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.24042/alidarah.v12i1.10828
  14. Iqbal, H. S., Akhtar, M. M. S., & Saleem, M. (2020). A Study of Decision Making Styles of Academic Managers in Public Sector Universities of the Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 181–196.
  15. Komara, E., Mulyanto, A., Rahman, I. A., Karimah, I., & Zainal, D. I. (2023). Implementasi Kepemimpinan Partisipatif dalam Manajemen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini di TK Radhi Ibrahim Nurfadilah (RIN) Baleendah. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (JIME), 9(3). https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v9i1.5205
  16. Lestari, A. (2017). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Partisipatif Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Efektifitas Implementasi Rencana Stratejik Pada Madrasah Aliyah Di Kabupaten Sukabumi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v23i1.5580
  17. Lubis, S. A. (2022). Kepemimpinan Situasional Pada Ciputra Group. ResearchGate.
  18. Mahanum, M. (2021). Tinjauan Kepustakaan. ALACRITY?: Journal of Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.52121/alacrity.v1i2.20
  19. Mardia, M., & Mukhtar S, M. (2022). Analisis Tipologi Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Dalam Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Educational Leadership: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.24252/edu.v1i2.26601
  20. Margerison, C., & Glube, R. (1979). Leadership Decision-Making: An Empirical Test Of The Vroom And Yetton Model. Journal of Management Studies, 16(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1979.tb00373.x
  21. Mestika, Y., Hayati, R., Simamora, R., Asmendri, A., & Sari, M. (2024). Pendekatan situasional dalam kepemimpinan di SMPN 3 Lubuk Sikaping: tinjauan komprehensif terhadap model Vroom-Yetton, path-goal theory dan pendekatan Rasulullah. JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia), 9(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29210/30033949000
  22. Mustakim, B. (2020). Perspektif Psikologi Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Irsyad?: Jurnal Bimbingan, Penyuluhan, Konseling, Dan Psikoterapi Islam, 8(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.15575/irsyad.v8i2.1965
  23. Muttaqin, S., SAM, M., Mustolihudin, M., & Abusiri, A. (2022). Insight Into Four Major Leadership Contingency Theories: Considering The Models For Indonesian Islamic Educational Context. Hikmah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 18(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.47466/hikmah.v18i2.209
  24. Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
  25. Othman, S. A., Ibrahim, M. B., Salleh, M. J., & Sidek, S. S. M. (2024). Taking Charge in Time of Crisis: A Multi-Sites Case Study of School Leaders in Kedah, Malaysia. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v12i1.68228
  26. Royani, A. R., Fauzi, A., & Zohriyah, A. (2024). The Effectiveness Of Participative Leadership Style Theory On The Performance Of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Educators Al-Hidayah Serang. Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.32806/jkpi.v5i2.167
  27. Sari, R. K. (2021). Penelitian Kepustakaan Dalam Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Humaniora, 4(2), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.35334/borneo_humaniora.v4i2.2249
  28. Susan Febriantina, Calvin Kimura, Hana Nurkhairani, Muhammad Fajar Bayu Wicaksono, Pradipta Afrah Nugraha, & Safrina Primadhita. (2025). Literature Review?: Teori-Teori Kepemimpinan (Modern dan Tradisional). Journal of Student Research, 3(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v3i1.3531
  29. Vignesh, M. (2020). Decision Making using Vroom-Yetton-Jago Model with a Practical Application. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 8(10), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.31876
  30. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1978). On the validity of the Vroom-Yetton model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.2.151
  31. Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and Decision-Making. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrc8r
  32. Wikipedia.org. (2024). Vroom–Yetton decision model. Https://En.Wikipedia.Org/Wiki/Main_Page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vroom–Yetton_decision_model