The Effect of the Kampus Mengajar Program on English Education Students’ Teaching Skills: A Comparative Study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 31, 2025
https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2025.v5i4-14
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Anisa Nurul Safitri
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Rini Fatmawati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to review the Effect of the Kampus Mengajar Program on the Teaching Skills of English Language Education Students of the 2021 intake at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. This initiative offers direct teaching practice in schools, which is expected to improve their pedagogical competence.
Method – The sample consisted of 54 participants from batches 5, 6, and 7, using a descriptive-comparative quantitative approach with a retrospective pretest-posttest design. Data collection used a closed questionnaire with a Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of 21 indicators: 15 questions based on the microteaching approach of Allen & Cooper (1972) and 6 questions based on the CLT theory of Richards (2006). Technical data analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 24 for Windows.
Findings – The results of the study, based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, indicate that (1) students’ teaching skills during the pretest are at the developing level with an average score of 3.05; (2) teaching skills after the posttest increase to the proficient category with an average score of 3.73; and (3) there is a significant difference between the pretest and posttest results, as shown by the Z value = -4.711 with Asymp. Sig (2-tailed) = 0.000 < 0.05.
Research Implications – These findings highlight the importance of experiential learning programs in enhancing the pedagogical competencies of English education students. However, the sample size is small, and the use of self-perception means that further research is recommended to use a mixed approach with a wider sample.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Safitri, A. N., & Fatmawati, R. (2025). The Effect of the Kampus Mengajar Program on English Education Students’ Teaching Skills: A Comparative Study. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(4), 1021–1034. https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2025.v5i4-14
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adisti, S. A., & Sumardjoko, B. (2024). Pengaruh minat dan program kampus mengajar terhadap kesiapan calon guru profesional mahasiswa fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan universitas muhammadiyah surakarta [Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/122179/
  2. Allen, D., & Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching reading. Massachusetts: Addir on-Wesley.
  3. Allen, D. W., & Cooper, J. M. (1972). Microteaching. In No.17 in the Series of PREP Reports (pp. 1–31). US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
  4. Blegur, J., Ma’mun, A., Berliana, Mahendra, A., Alif, M. N., Juliantine, T., & Lumba, A. J. . (2024). Integrated learning models for micro-teaching course. Emerging Science Journal, 8(6), 2480–2500. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-06-020
  5. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge.
  6. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guid e and reference.(4thedn). Boston.
  7. Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
  8. Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  9. Lestari, M. B., & Margana. (2024). Communicative language teaching (clt) implementation in kurikulum merdeka: A lesson from english teachers’ voices. JOLLT Journal of Language and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1657–1672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.11266
  10. Makhfuza, R., Hambali, & Hardian, M. (2022). Persepsi mahasiswa peserta kampus mengajar terhadap program kampus mengajar di fkip universitas riau. JISHUM Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.57248/jishum.v1i2.43
  11. Nasution, T., Meliani, F., Purba, R., Saputra, N., & Herman. (2023). Participation performance of students’ basic teaching skills in microteaching. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 2441–2448. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2307
  12. Nurhandayani. (2024). Keterampilan mengajar sebagai guru profesional. Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 2(1), 89–93. https://ejournal.edutechjaya.com/index.php/jitk
  13. Pappas, P. A., & DePuy, V. (2004). An overview of non-parametric tests in SAS: when, why, and how. Paper TU04. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, 1–5.
  14. Perry, S. R., Cabrera, A. F., & Vogt, W. P. (1999). Career maturity and college student persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 1(1), 41–58. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2190/13EA-M98P-RCJX-EX8X
  15. Prayitno, H. J., Sutama, Fuadi, D., Nurhidayat, Ratih, K., Harsono, Sufanti, M., Amalia, N., Sutarni, S., Yuliana, I., & Hariyatmi. (2020). Desain & pedoman pembelajaran mikro (A. D. Rahmawati (ed.)). Muhammadiyah University Press. https://fkip.ums.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2018/09/e-book-Mikroteaching-2020.pdf
  16. Ramadhani, G., Nidi, I. V., & Zahra, L. (2024). The role of communicative language teaching (clt ) in teaching english to indonesian elementary school students within the kurikulum merdeka. STAIRS: English Language Education Journal, 5(2), 143–151. http://repository.unj.ac.id/55756/
  17. Rianti, R., Nurcholis, Ivan Achmad Anggraini, R., & Safitri, W. (2025). The implementation of 8 teaching skills in microteaching competence test in english education program at universitas muhammadiyah bengkulu. Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal (TELLE), 05(01), 61–72. https://repository.umb.ac.id/1149/
  18. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. In Cambridge University Press (Vol. 25, Issue 2).
  19. Riduwan, M. B. A. (2022). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian.
  20. Rohmah, I. I. T. (2021). Microteaching: Preparation and performance (U. Salamah & M. Munir (eds.); First Edit). CV. Pustaka Learning Center. https://doi.org/ISBN: 978-623-6121-78-8
  21. Sitoy, J. S., & Sonsona, R. P. J. V. (2024). Investigating the use of communicative language teaching ( clt ) strategies to promote innovative teaching and learning approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(2), 393–402. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/79184
  22. Tersiana, A. (2018). Metode penelitian. Anak Hebat Indonesia.
  23. Ur, P. (2019). Theory and practice in language teacher education. Language Teaching, 52(4), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000090
  24. Yahya, A. I. B., Sumaryoto, & Prasetyono, H. (2024). The implementation of communicative language teaching (clt) method in english courses at new concept english education centre. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 4(11), 10752–10772. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i11.49918