Pegembangan Media Mind Mapping Digital Berbasis OBE Untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 31, 2025
https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2025.v5i4-18
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Mica Siar Meiriza
Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Jelita Angeli Purba
Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1394-3852
Krisentia Angelina Napitu
Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Agnes Anggreni Tamba
Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Nayla Ahlami Dalimunthe
Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

Abstract

Purpose – Students’ critical thinking skills in the History of Socialist Economic Thought course are still low because learning is mostly lecture-based and less interactive. Therefore, innovative media are needed to make learning more engaging and outcome oriented. This study aims to develop Outcome-Based Education (OBE)-based Digital Mind Mapping media and examine its feasibility and effectiveness in improving students’ critical thinking skills.
Method – The study used a Research and Development (R&D) approach with the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The subjects were 34 students of the Economics Education Study Program at Universitas Negeri Medan. Data were collected using tests (one group pretest–posttest) and non-test instruments such as observation, interviews, and questionnaires.
Findings – Validation results showed that the media was very feasible, with an average score of 87.14% from material, media, and design experts. Effectiveness testing obtained an N-Gain value of 0.58 (moderate) and Cohen’s d of 2.26 (very large effect), proving that the media effectively enhanced students’ critical thinking.
Research Implications – The findings strengthen the constructive alignment principle of OBE and support Mayer’s multimedia learning theory, emphasizing that visual and interactive media can improve students’ engagement and higher-order thinking skills.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Meiriza, M. S., Purba, J. A., Napitu, K. A., Tamba, A. A., & Dalimunthe, N. A. (2025). Pegembangan Media Mind Mapping Digital Berbasis OBE Untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(4), 1076–1090. https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2025.v5i4-18
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ali, Q. I. (2024). Towards more effective summative assessment in OBE: a new framework integrating direct measurements and technology. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00208-5
  2. Aulia Tria Handari, & Encep Supriatna. (2023). Penerapan Metode Mind Mapping Untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Ips. Jurnal Perseda?: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.37150/perseda.v6i1.1762
  3. Belva Saskia Permana, Lutvia Ainun Hazizah, & Yusuf Tri Herlambang. (2024). Teknologi Pendidikan: Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Di Era Digitalisasi. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 4(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i1.2702
  4. Cemerlang, Y. I., Kafiyuddin, M., & ... (2025). Penggunaan Media Mind Mapping untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Siswa MAN 1 Kudus dalam Berpikir Kritis pada Pembelajaran IPS. RUKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah …, 02(03), 136–144. https://ojs.ruangpublikasi.com/index.php/rukasi/article/view/297
  5. Gandhi, P. O., & Mary, Q. (2017). EDUCATION Prepared by?: Dr . Parag Gandhi PhD. May 2002. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14398.89923
  6. Guntara, Y. (2021). Normalized gain ukuran keefektifan treatment. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, March, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27603.40482
  7. Haida, Y. N., Murtini, W., & Ninghardjanti, P. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Mind Mapping Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Efisiensi?: Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, 19(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v19i1.46231
  8. Hamdoun, W. M. A. (2023). Constructive Alignment Approach: Enhancing Learning and Teaching. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0173
  9. Hristov, S., Nakov, D., & Mio?inovi?, J. (2023). Constructive Alignment Between Objectives, Teaching and Learning Activities, Student Competencies and Assessment Methods in Higher Education. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Sciences, 21(2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.46763/japs23212021h
  10. Ishwahyudi, D., Degeng, I. N. S., Henry Praherdhiono, & Kuswandi, D. (2023). The Influence of the Mind Mapping Learning Model Regarding Concept Understanding Learning Outcomes. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(3), 569–573. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i3.45711
  11. ITS, & ASEAN-QA. (2018). Guide Book Outcomes Based Education. 1–70.
  12. Jeslie Kartika Viani, I. G. A. N. T. J. (2023). Penerapan Metode Mind Mapping Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Di SMAN 1 Kuta Utara. 24(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.59672/widyadari.v24i2.3026
  13. M. Safri Sholahudin, Deni Adi Putra, & Fajar Setiawan. (2021). Meta Analisis Menggunakan Metode Mind Mapping dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Inventa, 5(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.36456/inventa.5.1.a2616
  14. Narsan, V. O. (2022). Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Mind Mapping terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Genetika Selama Pembelajaran Daring. Al Jahiz: Journal of Biology Education Research, 3(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.32332/al-jahiz.v3i1.4874
  15. Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Nasim Thompson, A., & Van Dusen, B. (2018). Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010115
  16. Okpatrioka. (2023). Innovative Research And Development (R&D) in Education. Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya, 1(1), 86–100.
  17. Putri, L. N., Atmojo, I. R. W., Ardiansyah, R., & Saputri, I. (2022). Analisis instrumen asesmen ipa berdasarkan teori berpikir kritis facione kelas V sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpd.v9i2.59886
  18. Rahmawati, A., Nisfah, N. L., & Kusairi, S. (2019). The Capability Analysis of High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) on Dynamic Electricity Material in Junior High School. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05211
  19. Rizki Herlambang, N., Sofwan, A., & Riyadi, M. A. (2023). Sistem Informasi Evaluasi Obe Program Studi Dan Pengukuran Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Mahasiswa. Transient, 12(3), 2685–0206. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/transient
  20. Rizki Herlambang, N., Sofwan, A., Riyadi, M. A., Waruwu, M., Wilson, L. O., Gandhi, P. O., Mary, Q., SuharsimiArikunto, Santoso, R. D., Budi Riharjo, I., Kurnia, K., Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Nasim Thompson, A., Van Dusen, B., Guntara, Y., Narsan, V. O., Cemerlang, Y. I., Kafiyuddin, M., … Biggs John Tang Catherine. (2023). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D): Konsep, Jenis, Tahapan dan Kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 4(1), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2141
  21. Saeroji, A., Andriyati, R., & Muhsin, M. (2021). Efisiensi Kajian Ilmu Administrasi. Prodi P.ADP FF UNY, 18(1), 1–14.
  22. Santoso, R. D., Budi Riharjo, I., & Kurnia, K. (2020). Independensi, Integritas, Serta Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Skeptisisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Journal of Accounting Science, 4(2), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v4i2.559
  23. Sari, A. I., Suryani, N., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Suharno, S. (2020). Digital learning, smartphone usage, and digital culture in indonesia education. Integration of Education, 24(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.098.024.202001.020-031
  24. SuharsimiArikunto. (1980). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. In A psicanalise dos contos de fadas. Tradução Arlene Caetano (Issue January).
  25. Syafira, P., Novaliza, S., Sulistianingsih, R., Restaryy, T. I., & Lasha, V. (2024). Evaluasi Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI), 6(3), 2092–2097. https://doi.org/10.61227/arji.v6i3.196
  26. Syahidah, N. (2015). Metode Pembelajaran Mind Mapping sebagai Upaya Mengembangkan Kreativitas Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Ekonomi. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Ekonomi FE UNY, (pp. 108-117).
  27. Syamsudin, M. S., & Maulana, I. (2023). Outcome-based education identifying determining factors in improving students learning achievement in higher education systems. Cendikia?: Media Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 13(6), 968–975.
  28. Waruwu, M. (2024). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D): Konsep, Jenis, Tahapan dan Kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(2), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2141
  29. Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom.s Taxonomy Revised. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 1(1), 1–8.
  30. Yanuar, F., Munandar, A., & Hardi, O. S. (2025). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Mind Mapping dan Student Facilitator and Explaining di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(1 Februari SE-Articles), 1393–1406. https://www.jurnaldidaktika.org/contents/article/view/1899
  31. Zheng, W., Wen, S., Lian, B., & Nie, Y. (2023). Research on a Sustainable Teaching Model Based on the OBE Concept and the TSEM Framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075656