Konstruktivisme Lev Semonovich Vygotsky dan Jerome Bruner: Model Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Kognitif Anak

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Begjo Tohari
Ainur Rahman

Abstract

Purpose – The constructivist learning theories of Vygotsky and Bruner highlight the effectiveness of learning through interaction, collaboration, and cognitive apprenticeship. Both theorists design instructional strategies that prioritize students' cognitive development, fostering creativity, deep understanding, and meaningful learning. While contributing significantly to education, the application of constructivism has its advantages and disadvantages. This research will discuss the principles and concepts of constructivism according to Vygotsky and Bruner, as well as analyze its strengths and weaknesses in classroom learning.
Methods – This research employs the literature review method, commonly known as a literature study. In this literature review, the researcher will analyze theories related to the existing materials. The data analysis technique used is thematic analysis, examining key ideas and organizing them into themes and the focus of the research.
Findings – The results of this research found two important concepts in Vygotsky's theory, namely the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and scaffolding. Then the discovery learning theory discovered by Bruner is understanding concepts, meanings, and relationships through an intuitive process to finally arrive at a conclusion called discovery learning. Bruner considers that discovery learning corresponds to the active search for knowledge by the learner and provides the best results. Trying to find solutions to problems produces knowledge that is truly meaningful as learning, especially for students.
Research Implications – The results of this study show that implementing constructivism requires sufficient time and resources while evaluating student progress can be a difficult task. There have also been criticisms of the ZPD concept that it may have limitations in encompassing the individual diversity of students. In implementation, some teachers may experience difficulties in adopting constructivist principles without adequate training or support.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Tohari, B., & Rahman, A. (2024). Konstruktivisme Lev Semonovich Vygotsky dan Jerome Bruner: Model Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Kognitif Anak . Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2024.v4i1-13

References

  1. Agustyaningrum, N., & Pradanti, P. (2022). Teori Perkembangan Piaget dan Vygotsky: Bagaimana Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar? Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5(1), 568–582.
  2. Bakar, Z. A. (2014). Psikologi pendidikan. Partridge Publishing Singapore.
  3. Buto, Z. A. (2010). Implikasi Teori Pembelajaran Jerome Bruner Dalam Nuansa Pendidikan Modern. Millah, 4(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.ed.khus.art3
  4. Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran (p. 152). Tampa Tempat Terbit: Erlangga.
  5. Habsy, B. A., Christian, J. S., & Unaisah, U. (2024). Memahami Teori Pembelajaran Kognitif dan Konstruktivisme serta Penerapannya. TSAQOFAH, 4(1), 308–325.
  6. Hadi, M. N., & Yusuf, W. F. (2022). Inovasi Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Mu’allim, 4(1), 53–66.
  7. Hamid, A. (2009). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Medan: Unimed Pres.
  8. Hatip, A., & Setiawan, W. (2021). Teori kognitif bruner dalam pembelajaran matematika. PHI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 87–97.
  9. Kusumaningpuri, A. R., & Fauziati, E. (2021). Model pembelajaran RADEC dalam perspektif filsafat konstruktivisme Vygotsky. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 103–111.
  10. Muhibin, M., & Hidayatullah, M. A. (2020). Implemntasi Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme Vygotsky Pada Mata Pelajaran Pai Di SMA Sains QurAn Yogyakata. Belajea: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 113–130.
  11. Munadi, Y. (2017). Penerapan Teori Belajar konstruktivisme pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbantuan Media Video Kelas VII di SMPN 87 Jakarta.
  12. Nasriaika. (2013). Teori Belajar Kontruktivistik Oleh Vygotsky. https://nasriaika1125.wordpress.com/2013/11/10/Teori-Belajar-Kontruktivistik-Oleh-Vygotsky/
  13. Payong, M. R. (2020). Zona perkembangan proksimal dan pendidikan berbasis konstruktivisme sosial menurut Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Missio, 12(2), 164–178.
  14. Pocerattu, I. C. (2023). Implikasi Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme Vygorsky Terhadap Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen. TANGKOLEH PUTAI, 20(1), 1–19.
  15. Puspitasari, Y., & Nurhayati, S. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 7(1), 93–108.
  16. Putri, A. S. (2015). Teori Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Menurut Lev Semonovich Vygotsky. http://aaphilla.blogspot.com/2015/05/teori-pembelajaran-konstruktivisme.html
  17. Sari, M., & Asmendri, A. (2020). Penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dalam penelitian pendidikan IPA. Natural Science, 6(1), 41–53.
  18. Suci, Y. T. (2018). Menelaah Teori Vygotsky Dan Interdepedensi Sosial Sebagai Landasan Teori Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Di Sekolah Dasar. NATURALISTIC?: Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v3i1.269
  19. Supardan, D. (2016). Teori dan Praktik Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. Edunomic, 4(1), 1–12.
  20. Unaenah, E., Hidyah, A., Aditya, A. M., Yolawati, N. N., Maghfiroh, N., Dewanti, R. R., & Safitri, T. (2020). Teori Brunner pada konsep bangun datar sekolah dasar. NUSANTARA, 2(2), 327–349.
  21. Utami, I. G. A. L. P. (2016). Teori Konstruktivisme dan Teori Sosiokultural: Aplikasi dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris. Prasi, 11(01), 4–11. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/PRASI/article/download/10964/7022
  22. Wibowo, H. (2020). Pengantar Teori-teori belajar dan Model-model pembelajaran. Puri cipta media.