Rekonstruksi Makna Kejujuran akademik Mahasiswa: Studi Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam Perspektif Etika Islam

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 31, 2026
https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i3-14
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Heni Ani Nuraeni
Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia
Irwan Baadilla
Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia
Ahmad Hidayatullah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia
Rokhmani
Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia
Siti Kodariah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to analyze the level of ChatGPT usage, examine students’ perceptions of academic honesty in its use from an Islamic ethics perspective, and reconstruct the meaning of academic honesty in the era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Methods – This study used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were gathered through questionnaires from 150 PBSI and PGSD students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA, followed by in-depth interviews with 10 students. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Findings – The results indicate that the level of ChatGPT usage among students was high (80.0%). Students’ perceptions of academic honesty in using ChatGPT were also categorized as high (74.8%), with the highest scores found in the dimensions of amanah (trustworthiness) (84.8%) and academic responsibility (84.2%). In contrast, lower scores were observed in AI-use transparency (57.8%), originality of work (64.8%), and ?idq (truthfulness) (66.2%). Qualitative findings revealed a reconstruction of the meaning of academic honesty, shifting from honesty as complete independence toward honesty as responsible and transparent use of technology.
Research Implications – This study was limited to students from two programs at one university. Its findings underscore the need to strengthen AI literacy, academic ethics, and institutional AI policies grounded in Islamic values: ?idq, amanah, mas’uliyyah, ihsan, and adab.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nuraeni, H. A., Baadilla, I., Hidayatullah, A., Rokhmani, R., & Kodariah, S. (2026). Rekonstruksi Makna Kejujuran akademik Mahasiswa: Studi Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam Perspektif Etika Islam. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(3), 754–774. https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i3-14
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., & Farhan, S. S. (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14(1).
  2. Adeoye, M. A. (2023). Review of sampling techniques for education. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 2(2), 87–94.
  3. Ahmed, Z., Shanto, S. S., Rime, M. H. K., Morol, M. K., Fahad, N., Hossen, M. J., & Abdullah-Al-Jubair, M. (2024). The generative AI landscape in education: Mapping the terrain of opportunities, challenges, and student perception. IEEE Access, 12, 147023–147050.
  4. Arasyidiah, N. S., & Marzuki, M. E. (2025). Studi Fenomenologi Tentang Peran Chatgpt Dalam Proses Belajar Mahasiswa Di Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan. Al-Qolamuna: Journal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 2(3), 304–3018.
  5. Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., Amoako, I., & Mahama, I. (2024). Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning. Discover Education, 3(1), 98.
  6. Bates, T., & Bozkurt, A. (2025). A critical scholarly conversation with Tony Bates: Insights on the future of online and distance education. Open Praxis, 17(3), 632–637.
  7. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. Int’l J. Educ. Tech. Higher Educ., 17, 1.
  8. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43.
  9. Chen, Z., Chen, C., Yang, G., He, X., Chi, X., Zeng, Z., & Chen, X. (2024). Research integrity in the era of artificial intelligence: Challenges and responses. Medicine, 103(27), e38811.
  10. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2021). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=s7rNtAEACAAJ
  12. Dabis, A., & Csáki, C. (2024). AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–13.
  13. Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., & Ngo, T. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100883.
  14. Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: Transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 23.
  15. Erhardt, C., Kullenberg, H., Grigoriadis, A., Kumar, A., Christidis, N., & Christidis, M. (2025). From policy to practice: the regulation and implementation of generative AI in Swedish higher education institutes. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21(1), 21.
  16. Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474.
  17. Gustilo, L., Ong, E., & Lapinid, M. R. (2024). Algorithmically-driven writing and academic integrity: exploring educators’ practices, perceptions, and policies in AI era. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 3.
  18. Heersmink, R., De Rooij, B., Clavel Vázquez, M. J., & Colombo, M. (2024). A phenomenology and epistemology of large language models: Transparency, trust, and trustworthiness. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(3), 41.
  19. Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 2.
  20. Johri, A., Hingle, A., & Schleiss, J. (2024). Misconceptions, pragmatism, and value tensions: Evaluating students’ understanding and perception of generative AI for education. 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9.
  21. Karkoulian, S., Sayegh, N., & Sayegh, N. (2025). ChatGPT unveiled: Understanding perceptions of academic integrity in higher education-A qualitative approach. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(3), 1171–1188.
  22. Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., louise Slade, E., Jeyaraj, A., kumar Kar, A., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., & ahmad Albashrawi, M. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
  23. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410.
  24. Majelis Diktilitbang PP Muhammadiyah. (2025). Pedoman Pendidikan AIK Al-Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan di Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah-’Aisyiyah . Majelis Diktilitbang PP Muhammadiyah.
  25. McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Collier, A. H. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, 100121.
  26. Medina, A., Tatuhey, E. L., & Kiswanto, R. H. (2024). Analisis Kepuasan SI-BTM Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): SI-BTM Satisfaction Analysis Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Method. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, 4(4), 1282–1289.
  27. Mustafidah, N. M., Mustofa, T. A., & Rohmani, A. F. (2023). Living Value Al-Islam and Kemuhammadiyahan At Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah Aisyah. Iseedu: Journal of Islamic Educational Thoughts and Practices, 7(2), 202–212.
  28. Orgianus, Y., Oemar, H., Praseytaningsih, E., & Amalia, H. K. (2024). Islamic values in lecturer competency development: A systematic literature review of trends, frameworks, and impacts in Islamic higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 69–83.
  29. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2), 1–24.
  30. Ravšelj, D., Kerži?, D., Tomaževi?, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., Iahad, N. A., Abdulla, A. A., Akopyan, A., Segura, M. W. A., & AlHumaid, J. (2025). Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. PLoS One, 20(2), e0315011.
  31. Rizki, M. R. M., Nur, C. N. N. F. C., Fildzah, N., & Iman, R. I. R. (2026). Integritas Akademik Mahasiswa di Era Artificial Intelligence: Analisis Etika Penggunaan ChatGPT pada Mahasiswa UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh: Indonesia. EDUCATIONIST: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(1), 19–29.
  32. Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2024). Collaborative working and critical thinking: Adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Sustainability, 16(13), 5367.
  33. Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49(2), 223–245.
  34. Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 31–40.
  35. Supriyadi, S., & Farihah, A. (2017). Buku Ajar Al-Islam Dan Kemuhammadiyahan–2 (AIK-2). Umsida Press, 1–322.
  36. Syahrial, M. F. (2025). Modal Sosial dan Persepsi Penggunaan AI dalam Pembelajaran: Pendekatan Fenomenologi pada Mahasiswa Program Studi PPKn. Maharsi: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Sosiologi, 7(3), 34–44.
  37. Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 21.