Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran QODE dan Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Pelajaran IPA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

vol 4 no 3
Published Jul 31, 2024
https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2024.v4i3-12
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Anisa Rizkia
STKIP Modern Ngawi, Indonesia
Anis Zahrotin
STKIP Modern Ngawi, Indonesia
Desi Nuzul Agnafia
STKIP Modern Ngawi, Indonesia

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to find out how well students' critical thinking skills are in learning science, especially in mixed materials, by using the QODE (Questioning, Organizing, Doing, and Evaluating) and Discovery Learning models.
Method – This research method applies quantitative methods. This study involved 49 students from class VIII A and VIII B as subjects with details of 25 students of class VIII A and 24 students of VIII B from SMP Negeri 2 Paron. The data analysis technique used prerequisite test analysis. The data analysis technique uses prerequisite analysis in the form of validity, reliability, normality, and homogeneity tests, while the hypothesis test uses an independent sample t-test.
Findings – The QODE learning model is more effective in improving critical thinking skills compared to the Discovery Learning learning model on mixed materials at SMP Negeri 2 Paron with an average posttest value of 81.96> 78.00. The results of the hypothesis test of the posttest value proved that the tcount> ttable (1.677) while the tcount (QODE) was 2.138 and the tcount (Discovery Learning) was 2.128. This indicates a significant difference in the post-test results, which leads to the rejection of H0 and acceptance of H1 which indicates the effectiveness of the model. The result of the t-test value of QODE > Discovery Learning is 2.138 > 2.128 so it can be concluded that the QODE learning model is more effective than Discovery Learning in improving critical thinking in science lessons, especially mixed material for students of SMP Negeri 2 Paron.
Research Implications – Students' critical thinking skills can be improved with QODE and Discovery Learning when learning science, especially mixed materials at SMP Negeri 2 Paron where the QODE model is more effective than Discovery Learning.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rizkia, A., Zahrotin, A., & Agnafia, D. N. (2024). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran QODE dan Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Pelajaran IPA. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(3), 780–793. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2024.v4i3-12
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Agnafia, D. N. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Florea?: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 6(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v6i1.4369
  2. Agnafia et al.,(2023). Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa SD Melalui Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) . Konstruktivisme: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 15(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v15i2.2953
  3. Benaya et al., (2023). Perancangan Mekanik Gim Edukasi Kimia Tabel Periodik Unsur Menggunakan Metode Iterative dan Rapid Prototyping. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi …, 7(5), 2063–2074. https://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/12632%0Ahttps://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/download/12632/5748
  4. Diharjo et al., (2017). Pentingnya kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa dalam paradigma pembelajaran konstruktivistik. Prosiding TEP & PDs, 4(39), 445–449. http://pasca.um.ac.id/conferences/index.php/sntepnpdas/article/view/899/571
  5. Fajri, Z. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Sd. Jurnal IKA PGSD (Ikatan Alumni PGSD) UNARS, 7(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.36841/pgsdunars.v7i2.478
  6. Febtiansyah, D. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Membuat Karya Dekoratif Siswa Kelas Iii Di Sdn ….
  7. Girsang et al., (2022). " Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dengan Model Program For International Student Assesment (PISA) Konten Quantity Pada Materi Himpunan di Kelas VII SMP HKBP Sidorame Medan."SEPREN; Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied.
  8. Laeni et al., (2022). "Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Negeri 13 Samarinda Materi Impuls dan Momentum." JLFP: Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika. 3(2): 105-115.
  9. Marudut et al., (2020). "Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran IPA melalui Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses." Jurnal Basicedu. 4(3): 577-585.
  10. Manurung et al., (2023). "Implementasi Berpikir Kritis dalam Upaya Mengembangakan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa." Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar. 5(2): 120-132.
  11. Meriyana et al., (2020). " Efektivitas Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik pada Sub Konsep Bryophyta dan Pterydophyta di Kelas X SMA IT Riyadlussholihin Sukaratu. " Metaedukasi. 2(2): 64-78.
  12. Nurjannah et al., (2018). “Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter dan IPTEK untuk Generasi Millenial Indonesia dalam Menuju SDGs 2030.” Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika 2018, 3, 2527–5917.
  13. Nurlinawati. (2022). Optimalisasi Hasil Belajar IPA Materi Listrik Statis Dengan Model Pembelajaran QODE Berbantu Alat Peraga Pada Siswa Kelas IX Sumayyah Di SMP Negeri 10M Langsa Tahun 2019. SCIENCE: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 2(1), 17–23.
  14. OECD, E. T. (2022). Innovation PISA 2022: Vol. I (Issue 2). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/innovation/
  15. Priliyanti et al., (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Dalam Mempelajari Kimia Kelas Xi. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpk.v5i1.32402
  16. Safitri et al., (2024). The effect of the predict observe and explain learning model on critical thinking ability of junior high school students on environmental pollution. BIO-INOVED?: Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v6i1.16268
  17. Sholikhah et al., (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar. PISCES: Proceeding of Integrative Science Education Seminar, 1, 587–593. https://prosiding.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/pisces
  18. Sitepu et al., (2019). Metode Kuantitatif untuk Manajemen Dilengkapi dengan Contoh Penggunaan Aplikasi Excell - SAS dan Quantitaive Methods.
  19. Ulfah et al., (2023). Analisis Teori Taksonomi Bloom pada Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Amar (JAA), 4(1), 13–22.
  20. Susilawati et al., (2020). Analisis Tingkat Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 6.(1). 11-16.
  21. Yoki. 2019. Pembelajaran 3 . Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi.
  22. Zahrotin et al.,(2021). Keefektifan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Untuk Melatih Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Sma. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 1(02), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v1i02.8