Cooperative Learning: One Step in Answering the Complexity of Islamic Religious Education

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sofyan Rofi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9395-6022
Bahar Agus Setiawan
Tri Endang Jatmikowati
Dahani Kusumawati
Husnun Hanifah Darmayanti
Linda Damayanti

Abstract

Purpose – The complexity of Islamic religious education learning, with its dogmatic and doctrinal patterns, can be a driving factor in students' boredom and passive attitude toward learning activities. This context requires teachers to be able to innovate and be creative in designing active, innovative, creative, and fun learning plans. Steps that can be taken include using cooperative learning models, with various types of existing methods, such as Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS).
Method – This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study type of research. The instrument used in this research is a questionnaire. The data analysis technique uses percentages to determine the level of student perception of the learning model used.
Findings – The results of the research prove that, from a student perspective, these two methods, which are part of the cooperative learning model, are very effective in improving student achievement and learning outcomes in Islamic religious education. The effectiveness of the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) method from the student perspective reached 83.9 percent. The percentage value for the Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) is 85.5 percent.
Research Implications – Using the TSTS and STAD models, which are part of the cooperative learning approach, has very good implications for increasing the effectiveness of Islamic religious education learning in schools. The adaptive nature of these two models can bridge the characteristics of Islamic religious education, which has dogmatic and doctrinal aspects. The results of this research confirm that TSTS and STAD can concretely and effectively improve student learning outcomes in Islamic religious education.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Rofi, S., Setiawan, B. A., Jatmikowati, T. E., Kusumawati, D., Darmayanti, H. H., & Damayanti, L. (2024). Cooperative Learning: One Step in Answering the Complexity of Islamic Religious Education. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(2), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2024.v4i2-16

References

  1. Afandi, S. (2018). Konsep Ta’awun (Cooperative Learning) Dalam Al-Qur’an. EL-HIKMAH: Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.20414/elhikmah.v0i0.344
  2. Agrahari, R. (2016). The Nature of Educational Reform and Change: From Teacher-centered to Student-centered learning. Educational Quest- An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7311.2016.00030.1
  3. Anggraeni, K. A., & Yusnita, R. (2017). Teachers’ Role in 21st Century: Teacher is a Facilitator, not a Dictator. LUNAR: Journal of English and Art, 1(1).
  4. Amin, A. (2015). Pembelajaran Cooperative Tipe Two Stay Two Stray Berbasis Multimedia dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMK pada Mata Pelajaran PAI. At-Ta’lim?: Media Informasi Pendidikan Islam, 14(1).
  5. Esminarto, E., Sukowati, S., Suryowati, N., & Anam, K. (2016). Implementasi Model STAD Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siwa. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v1i1.2
  6. Fadhilah, M., Trisnani, A., & Awaludin, A. (2023). Scientific-Cum-Doctriner dalam Studi Islam Menurut Mukti Ali. Aqlania, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v13i2.6817
  7. Faryadi, Q. (2012). Effective Teaching and Effective Learning?: Instructional Design Perspective. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(1).
  8. Guile, D., & Wilde, R. J. (2022). Complexity Theory and Learning: Less Radical than it Seems? Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2132934
  9. Habibi, M. M. (2017). Corak Pendidikan Islam Inklusif. Jurnal EL-Tarbawi, 10(1).
  10. Hamid, A. (2019). Berbagai Metode Mengajar bagi Guru dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 9 (2).
  11. Hasan, M. (2022). What Makes an Effective Teacher in the 21st Century? Educational Quest- An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.30954/2230-7311.1.2022.5
  12. Himami, Z. H. & A. S. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Menumbuhkan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa. Irsyaduna: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaaan, 1(1).
  13. Irah Larasati, Q., Cahyaningtyas, A., Mangzila, A., Agus Firawati, A., Munirotul Yuanita, S., & Lesmana, I. (2020). The Role and Function of Teachers in Improving Effective Learning in Classes. https://doi.org/10.2991/coema-19.2019.4
  14. Khoerunnisa, N., Akil, & Abidin, J. (2022). Urgensi Metode Pembelajaran Dalam Pendidikan. PeTeKa (Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran), 5(14).
  15. Mahmudah, M. (2016). Urgensi Diantara Dualisme Metode Pembelajaran Ceramah Dalam Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar Untuk Siswa MI/SD. Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.31603/cakrawala.v11i1.107
  16. Mira, M., & Marlina, M. (2020). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam Siswa SMKN 1 Kendari?: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(1).
  17. Mirdad, J. (2020). Model-Model Pembelajaran (Empat Rumpun Model Pembelajaran). Jurnal Sakinah.
  18. Munawaroh, S. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif ( Cooperative Learning ) Dalam Strategi Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Arab. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab II.
  19. Murni, N. F. (2021). Upaya Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Science, Engineering, Education, and Development Studies (SEEDS): Conference Series, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/seeds.v5i1.56736
  20. Nadjmuddin, M. (2010). Konsep Ilmu Dalam Alquran. Inspirasi, X.
  21. Ngaamo, R., & Lawrence, D. (2023). Learning is fun, or at least it should be. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 1. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.1522
  22. Nisha, H. (2021). Efektifitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas XI Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SMA Negeri 5 Barru. Uin Alauddin Makasar.
  23. Nurmi. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Meningkatkan Kemandirian Belajar Peserta Didik. Generasi Kampus, 3(2).
  24. Pane, A., Dasopang, M. D. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Fitrah Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 03(2).
  25. Rowikarim, A. (2017). Mengajar Yang Efektif Menjadi Penentu Kualitas Seorang Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan UNIGA, 7(1).
  26. Santoso, B., Triono, M., & Zulkifli, Z. (2023). Tantangan Pendidikan Islam Menuju Era Society 5.0: Urgensi Pengembangan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran PAI di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v5i1.2963
  27. Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3-13, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.963370
  28. Suparlan. (2019). Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. Islamika, 01(02), 79–88.
  29. Wartomo, W. (2016). Peran guru dalam pembelajaran era digital. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah Nasional Guru (Ting) Vii, November.
  30. Wulandari, I. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD ( Student Teams Achievement Division) dalam Pembelajaran MI. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v4i1.1754
  31. Yang, X. (2023). A Historical Review of Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9
  32. Zahra, D. N., & Fasa, M. I. (2018). The Cooperative Learning Concept On Qur’an. HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v15i1.508.49-67