Correlation between Lecturer Support and Student Satisfaction: Insights from Blended English for Tourism Course

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 30, 2025
https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2025.v5i3-1
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Addinda Maulidita Antari
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5294-3157
Eri Kurniawan
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Purpose – This study investigates the relationship between hospitality students’ perceptions of lecturer support and their satisfaction with the English for Tourism course delivered in a blended learning format in response to the changing learning environments following the COVID-19 pandemic. Amid increasing demands for technology-integrated instruction in English for Specific Purposes (ESP), this research highlights the role of pedagogical support in shaping student satisfaction.
Method – Employing a quantitative correlational approach, this study collected data using validated instruments: the Scale of Perceived Instructor Support (SPIS) and the ESP Student Satisfaction Scale. Out of 92 students enrolled in the course, 47 (51.1%) participated voluntarily. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was applied to examine the relationship between perceived lecturer support and student satisfaction.
Findings – Results indicated that students perceived moderate to high levels of support from their lecturers and reported a generally positive experience with the course, as reflected in a strong positive correlation (r=0.732, p < 0.01) between lecturer support and student satisfaction, emphasizing the importance of lecturer presence, interpersonal connection, and responsive feedback in blended ESP instruction.
Research Implications – The study contributes to the growing literature of ESP pedagogy and blended learning by affirming the crucial role of lecturer support in shaping positive student experiences. The research is limited by its single-institution scope, modest sample size, and insufficient examination of factors affecting students’ willingness to continue learning in blended format. Future research is recommended to investigate lecturer support’s impact on student motivation, psychological challenges, and learning outcomes, using longitudinal or mixed methods approaches.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Antari, A. M., & Kurniawan, E. (2025). Correlation between Lecturer Support and Student Satisfaction: Insights from Blended English for Tourism Course. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(3), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.62491/njpi.2025.v5i3-1
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Afida, A., & Junaidi, A. (2021). Student Satisfaction Index on Lecturer Performance Based on E-learning and Competence. At-Taqaddum, 13(2), 117–136.
  2. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  3. Alimorad, Z., & Saleki, A. (2022). Challenges and Opportunities of Web-based Assessment in EFL Courses as Perceived by Different Stakeholders. Applied Research on English Language, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2022.132413.1843
  4. Almasi, M., & Zhu, C. (2019). Studying Teaching Presence in Relation to Learner Performance in Blended Learning Courses in a Tanzanian University: A Mixed Design Approach. Proceedings of the 8th Teaching & Education Conference, Vienna. 8th Teaching & Education Conference, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.20472/TEC.2019.008.002
  5. Almuhanna, M. (2023). Improving E-Assessment Based on University Students’ Experiences. TOJET, 22(1), 130–143.
  6. An, F., Yu, J., & Xi, L. (2023). Relations between perceived teacher support and academic achievement: Positive emotions and learning engagement as mediators. Current Psychology, 42(30), 26672–26682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03668-w
  7. Anthony Jnr., B. (2022). An exploratory study on academic staff perception towards blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3107–3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10705-x
  8. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy?enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
  9. Avsheniuk, N., Seminikhyna, N., Svyrydiuk, T., & Lutsenko, O. (2021). ESP Students’ Satisfaction with Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ukraine. Arab World English Journal, 1, 222–234. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.17
  10. Bye, L., Muller, F., & Oprescu, F. (2020). The impact of social capital on student wellbeing and university life satisfaction: A semester-long repeated measures study. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(5), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1705253
  11. Chandra, D., & Fitriyanto, A. (2024). An Empirical Analysis of Student Satisfaction with Lecturer Teaching Quality: Applying the Expectation-Disconfirmation Theory. Indonesian Journal of Economics and Management, 4(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.35313/ijem.v4i3.6425
  12. Chen, I.-C. (2023). Enhancing EFL Students’ Writing Skills through Formative Assessment in a Blended Learning Course. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 24(2), 86–103.
  13. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
  14. Constantinou, E. K., Papadima-Sophocleous, S., & Souleles, N. (2019). Finding the way through the ESP maze: Designing an ESP teacher education programme. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, E. K. Constantinou, & C. N. Giannikas (Eds.), ESP teaching and teacher education: Current theories and practices (1st ed., pp. 27–46). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.33.924
  15. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  16. Deeley, S. J., Fischbacher-Smith, M., Karadzhov, D., & Koristashevskaya, E. (2019). Exploring the ‘wicked’ problem of student dissatisfaction with assessment and feedback in higher education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1644659
  17. Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2020). Emotions in Second Language Acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World, 196(1), 34–49.
  18. Dou, A. (2024). Language Needs and Learning Strategies of ESP Learners. Frontiers in Educational Research, 7(5), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2024.070537
  19. Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2016). The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Update*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12097
  20. Fisher, D. P., Brotto, G., Lim, I., & Southam, C. (2025). The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2449891
  21. Fisher, R., Perényi, Á., & Birdthistle, N. (2021). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702
  22. Gaffas, Z. M. (2023). Students’ perceptions of e-learning ESP course in virtual and blended learning modes. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10329–10358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11579-x
  23. Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
  24. Hendrian, N., & Kurniawati, L. A. (2024). A correlational study on teacher-student relationships and students’ engagement in EFL classes. Cambodian Journal of Educational and Social Sciences (CJESS), 1(2), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.69496/cjess.v1i2.31
  25. Hernández, E. H., Lozano-Jiménez, J. E., De Roba Noguera, J. M., & Moreno-Murcia, J. A. (2022). Relationships among instructor autonomy support, and university students’ learning approaches, perceived professional competence, and life satisfaction. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0266039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266039
  26. Hornstra, L., Stroet, K., Rubie-Davies, C., & Flint, A. (2023). Teacher Expectations and Self-Determination Theory: Considering Convergence and Divergence of Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09788-4
  27. Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. (2005). Student Satisfaction in the Virtual Classroom. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580X/2005.1071
  28. Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
  29. Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
  30. Liao, H., Zhang, Q., Yang, L., & Fei, Y. (2023). Investigating relationships among regulated learning, teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning: An experience sampling analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12997–13025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11717-5
  31. Liu, T., & Mantuhac, P. B. (2024). Teacher Support and Student Engagement in the Conduct of Blended Learning Instruction for English as A Foreign Language. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 11(2), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.54097/1g7q6h12
  32. Marlina, E., Tjahjadi, B., & Ningsih, S. (2021). Factors Affecting Student Performance in E-Learning: A Case Study of Higher Educational Institutions in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 993–1001. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO4.0993
  33. McNeill, L., & Bushaala, S. (2023). Meaningful connection in virtual classrooms: Graduate students’ perspectives on effective instructor presence in blended courses. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1271245. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1271245
  34. Megahed, N., & Ghoneim, E. (2022). Blended Learning: The New Normal for Post-COVID-19 Pedagogy. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.291980
  35. Moreira, F. P., & Araújo Lima, D. (2024). Systematic literature review on the impact of Blended Learning in promoting student engagement and autonomy: Findings and recommendations. Revista Brasileira de Informática Na Educação, 32, 242–269. https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2024.3284
  36. Mubango, H., & Ngirande, H. (2024). Self-Regulated Learning: Time Management in a Blended Learning Environment for Student Academic Performance. In S. Mistretta (Ed.), Education and Human Development (Vol. 29). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1006068
  37. Muijs, D. (2010). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  38. Pelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: The role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01002-x
  39. Pham, L. A., & Huynh, T. M. D. (2023). Factors Influencing Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning English for Specific Purposes. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(4), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0285
  40. Prananto, K., Cahyadi, S., Lubis, F. Y., & Hinduan, Z. R. (2025). Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students – a systematic literature review. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w
  41. Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
  42. Ramadhan, M. F., Mundilarto, M., Ariswan, A., Irwanto, I., Bahtiar, B., & Gummah, S. (2023). The Effect of Interface Instrumentation Experiments-Supported Blended Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Academic Achievement. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 17(14), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i14.38611
  43. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
  44. Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as Facilitators: What Autonomy?Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/501484
  45. Rehman, M. A., Woyo, E., Akahome, J. E., & Sohail, M. D. (2022). The influence of course experience, satisfaction, and loyalty on students’ word-of-mouth and re-enrolment intentions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 32(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1852469
  46. Sakti, N. S. S., Sarkiah, S., Sukma, S., Amaluddin, A., & Efendi, R. (2024). Redefining Esp: Bridging The Gap Between Traditional Methods and Modern Educational Needs. Klasikal?: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 6(3), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v6i3.1164
  47. Shurygin, V., Abdullayev, I., Hajiyev, H., Yakutina, M., Kozachek, A., & Zakiev, R. (2024). Blended Learning: The Effect on Students’ Self-Regulation and Academic Achievements. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11057892
  48. Sihombing, D., Lutfhi, M., Nabila, T., Silitonga, J., & Fachruddin, W. (2025). The Effect of Academic Service Quality on Student Satisfaction. Journal of Advances in Accounting, Economics, and Management, 2(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.47134/aaem.v2i3.572
  49. Su, F., Zou, D., Wang, L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). Student engagement and teaching presence in blended learning and emergency remote teaching. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00263-1
  50. Susanti, S., Pujiastuti, P., & Purnanto, A. W. (2021). Students’ Perception of the Assessment Transparency Based Google Sheet. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1269–1277. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.648
  51. Taylor, P. (2024). Blended learning challenges of EFL undergraduate students: Student learning experience in an AI-integrated ESP course. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(3), 1431–1449. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.37472
  52. Thahir, M., Widiawati, & Baitillah, N. (2023). The Post Pandemic Education: A Blended Learning Approach for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in New Normal Era. International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research, 3(3), 99–108.
  53. Wong, W. H., & Chapman, E. (2023). Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher Education, 85(5), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00874-0
  54. Yang, F.-Y. (2023). Flexibility as a double-edged sword? Language learner autonomy in a blended self-directed learning program beyond the classroom. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v6n3.1194
  55. Young-Jones, A., Hart, B., Yadon, C. A., & Buchanan, E. M. (2022). Validation of a Four Factor Measure: Scale of Perceived Instructor Support. Psychological Reports, 125(3), 1714–1731. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211000653
  56. Zhang, Y., Chen, T., & Wang, C. (2020). Factors Influencing Students’ Willingness to Choose Blended Learning in Higher Education. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_24