Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Antara Teori dan Praktik
Article Sidebar
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Share Article
Pindai QR code ini untuk membuka artikel di smartphone Anda.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose – For a real educator, instructional activities in the classroom constitute a series of investigations for sustainable quality improvement. However, such classroom inquiries, which are better known as classroom action research in teachers’ world, remain to be seen as exclusive and often neglected, and therefore learning process and outcome become less optimum or even failed. This article aims to examine the gap that exists between the theory and practice of classroom action research and offer its corrections.
Methods – This study is based on observation and retrospective interviews during either pre-service or in-service teacher education and training and information obtained from relevant literature. Data/Information regarding the classroom action research practices was confronted with what experts in the field “say”.
Findings – Some important points on teachers’ bad practices in implementing classroom action research, and most possible causes, as well as their proper practices, have been crystallized through this review.
Research Implications – At the end of this paper, teachers are offered some ways that prevent them from misconceiving and wrongly implementing classroom action research.
Keywords
- Classroom Action Research
- CAR
- bad practice
- teachers
- learning process
References
Alfaqih, B., Hoirunnisa, F., Sa’diyah, M. S., Khoerunnisa, N. I., & Pauziah, N. “Kendala-Kendala dalam Pelaksanaan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.” Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa 1, no. 1 (2023): 39-47. https://riset-iaid.net/index.php/jpm/article/view/1431
Amalia, N. & Willis, F. “Improving Teacher Quality through Classroom Action Research.” Journal of Community Service and Empowerment 2, no. 3 (2021): 133-139. https://doi.org/10.22219/jcse.v2i3.17934
Atkinson, D. J. & Bolt, S. “Using Teaching Observations to Reflect upon and Improve Teaching Practice in Higher Education.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10, no. 3 (2010): 1–19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ906466.pdf
Bala, R. “Teacher as Researcher.” International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 4, no. 4 (2014): 10-16. https://www.ijrssh.com/admin/upload/02%20DR.%20RAJNI%20BALA.pdf
Bergmark, U. “The Role of Action Research in Teachers’ Efforts to Develop Research--Based Education in Sweden: Intentions, Outcomes, and Prerequisite Conditions.” Educational Action Research (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1847155
Crawford, R. “Action Research as Evidence-Based Practice: Enhancing Explicit Teaching and Learning Through Critical Reflection and Collegial Peer Observation.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 47, no. 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14221/1835-517X.6065
Garces, A. Y. C. & Granada, L. M. “The Role of Collaborative Action Research in Teachers’ Profesional Development.” Profile 18, no. 1 (2016): 39-54. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n1.49148
Glasscock, J. S. P. “Authoritative Knowledge.” Erkenntnis 87, no. 5 (2020): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00313-5
Hastuti, S. “Penelitian Tindakan Kelas sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Pengembangan Pembelajaran Mahasiswa PBI UNS.” Dwija Cendikia: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik 6, no. 3 (2022): 553-561. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jdc/article/download/68126/37999
Kayapinar, U. “Reflection in Language Teaching: A Comparison between Preservice and Experienced Teachers of English.” Educational Research and Reviews 13, no. 23 (2018): 754-763. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1199872.pdf
Machali, I. “Bagaimana Melakukan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Bagi Guru?” Indonesian Journal of Action Research 1, no. 2 (2022): 315-327. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijar.2022.12-21
Oranga, J. & Gisore, B. “Action Research in Education.” Open Access Library Journal 10, no. 7 (2023): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110306
Putriani, M. R., Wahyuni, S., & Noviani, L. “Analisis Kesulitan–Kesulitan yang Dialami Guru Ekonomi untuk Melakukan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.” Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis dan Ekonomi 2, no. 1 (2016): 1-17. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/ptn/article/view/8781/0
Rasita, A., Inra, A., & Arizal, A. “Kendala-Kendala yang Dihadapi Guru SMK Negeri 5 Padang dalam Melaksanakan 4 Tahap Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Vocational Education 4, no. 1 (2016): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v4i1.7877
Richards, J. C. & Lockhart, C. Reflective Teaching In Second Language Classrooms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667169
Suwartono, T. & Nitiasih, P. K. “ProDev Participation and Teaching Performance: A Case Study of Two Urban School EFL teachers.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 8, no. 7 (2020): 320-325. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080752
Suwartono. Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogjakarta: Penerbit Andi (2014).
Syah, M. N. S. “Classroom Action Research as Professional Development of Teachers in Indonesia.” Jurnal Tarbawi 13, no. 1 (2016): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.34001/tarbawi.v13i1.526
Wulandari, D., Narmaditya, B. S., Utomo, S. H., & Prayitno, P. H. “Teachers’ Perception on Classroom Action Research.” 3rd ICEEBA: International Conference on Economics, Education, Business and Accounting (2019): 313-320. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i11.4015
Zahid, M. & Khanam, A. Effect of Reflective Teaching Practices On The Performance Of Prospective Teachers.” TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 18, no. 1 (2019): 32-43. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v18i1/1814.pdf