Developing Critical Thinking in Digital Learning Environments: Challenges and Opportunities
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to map existing research on critical thinking in digital learning environments by identifying reported challenges, opportunities, and pedagogical strategies.
Methods – A scoping review was conducted following the framework of Arksey and O’Malley (2005). A systematic search of the Scopus database was performed using the keywords critical thinking, digital learning, online learning, and blended learning. After automated filtering, title screening, abstract screening, and full-text review, 20 peer-reviewed open-access journal articles published between 2020 and 2025 were included. Data were extracted and synthesized in relation to three research questions addressing challenges, opportunities, and pedagogical strategies.
Findings – The review identified recurring challenges, including superficial integration of higher-order thinking, limited learner self-regulation, technological and institutional constraints, and assessment limitations. At the same time, digital learning environments offer opportunities through flexible access, authentic learning tasks, collaborative interaction, and metacognitive support. Pedagogical strategies such as inquiry-based, project-based, case-based, and flipped learning were consistently associated with positive critical thinking outcomes when supported by instructional alignment and scaffolding.
Research Implications – The findings emphasize the central role of pedagogical design in fostering critical thinking through digital learning. As a scoping review, this study maps trends rather than evaluating intervention effectiveness and is limited to open-access Scopus-indexed articles.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
- Al-Said, K., Berestova, A., Ismailova, N., & Pronkin, N. (2024). The impact of video-based virtual reality training on critical thinking and cognitive load. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(5), 3239. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i5.28109
- Anderson, L. W. ., & Krathwohl, D. R. . (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing?: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
- Attipoe, S. G. (2024). Project Management Pedagogy: Cultivating Critical Thinking Skills In Higher Education. Advanced Education, 12(24), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.296878
- Bekteshi, E., Gollopeni, B., & Avdiu, E. (2023). The challenges of conducting online inquiry-based learning among tertiary level education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1700
- Biggs, J. B. ., & Tang, C. S. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university?: what the student does. McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
- Bloom, B. S. ., Krathwohl, D. R. ., & Masia, B. B. . (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives?: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 2, Affective domain?; by David R. Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Bertram B. Masia. Longman.
- Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
- Clark, D. L. ., & Goellnicht, D. C. . (1995). New Romanticisms?: Theory and Critical Practice. University of Toronto Press Inc., NBN International Ltd [distributor], . University of Toronto Press-Publications [distributor], . Inbooks [distributor], . Inbooks [distributor], . University of Toronto Press-Publications [distributor].
- Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
- Dumitru, D., Minciu, M., Mihaila, R. A., Livinti, R., & Paduraru, M. E. (2023). Experimental Programs of Critical Thinking Enhancement: A Worked-Based, Blended Learning Higher Education Curriculum for Economics. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101031
- Facione, P. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251303244
- Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
- Goodsett, M. (2020). Assessing the Potential for Critical Thinking Instruction in Information Literacy Online Learning Objects Using Best Practices. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.4
- Halpern, D. F. . (2014). Thought and knowledge?: an introduction to critical thinking. Psychology Press.
- Herrington, Jan., Reeves, T. C. ., & Oliver, Ron. (2010). A guide to authentic E-learning. Routledge.
- Khadka, J., Dahal, N., Acharya, U., Puri, G., Subedi, N., & Hasan, Md. K. (2025). Higher-order thinking skills in e-learning contexts in higher education: a phenomenological study. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1555541
- Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
- Kurniawan, D., Masitoh, S., Bachri, B. S., Wahyuningsih, T., Mulawarman, W. gede, & Vebibina, A. (2024). Evaluation of Digital Project Based Blended Learning Model to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4847
- Kusumandari, R. B., Triluqman BS, H., & Martitah. (2025). Enhancing Critical Thinking and Student Independence through Interactive Math Media: An Articulate Storyline-Based Study in Indonesian Elementary Education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 15(5), 312. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2025-0178
- Laurillard, Diana. (2012). Teaching as a design science?: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
- Lave, Jean., & Wenger, Etienne. (1991). Situated learning?: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lijun, C., & Yoshida, M. (2023). Sequential Analysis of Online Scholarly Discussions of University Students using a Cognitive Subset of Critical Thinking. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0053
- Manousou, E. (2025). Critical Thinking in Distance Education: The Challenges in a Decade (2016–2025) and the Role of Artificial Intelligence. Education Sciences, 15(6), 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060757
- Maryani, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., & Purwanti, S. (2022). Promoting higher-order thinking skills during online learning: The integration of metacognition in science for higher education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(4), 1980. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.23129
- Pereles, A., Ortega-Ruipérez, B., & Lázaro, M. (2024). The power of metacognitive strategies to enhance critical thinking in online learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(3), 831. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2721
- Poce, A. (2021). Virtual Museum Experience for Critical Thinking Development: First Results from the National Gallery of Art (MOOC, US). Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 24. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2021-024-poce
- Redecker, Christine., & Punie, Yves. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators : DigCompEdu. Publications Office.
- Solovyeva, N., Tapalova, O., & Smirnov, S. (2023). Specifics of the students’ critical thinking formation within active learning space. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1132525
- Suwardika, G., Sopandi, A. T., Indrawan, I. P. O., & Masakazu, K. (2024). A flipped classroom with whiteboard animation and modules to enhance students’ self-regulation, critical thinking and communication skills: a conceptual framework and its implementation. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 19(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2023-0115
- Veng, S. (2022). Using an Online Student Response System to Promote Student Engagement in Critical Thinking Classes. International Journal of TESOL Studies. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230106
- Vygotskii?, L. S. ., Rieber, R. W. ., Carton, A. S. ., Bruner, J. S. ., Minick, Norris., Knox, J. E. ., & Stevens, C. B. . (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Plenum Press.
- Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Krismayani, N. W., Murtini, N. M. W., Mantra, I. B. N., & Sukoco, H. (2022). Communication, Inquiring, Networking, Teaching, Applying (CINTA) as an Effective Learning Model to Improve Students? Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(12), 1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.12.1757
- Yang, W., Zhang, X., Chen, X., Lu, J., & Tian, F. (2024). Based case based learning and flipped classroom as a means to improve international students’ active learning and critical thinking ability. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 759. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05758-8
- Yulian, R. (2021). The flipped classroom: Improving critical thinking for critical reading of EFL learners in higher education. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.18366
- Zainil, M., Kenedi, A. K., Rahmatina, Indrawati, T., & Handrianto, C. (2024). The Influence of STEM-Based Digital Learning on 6C Skills of Elementary School Students. Open Education Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0039
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2